Personal Thoughts on
Using Wikis in the Media Center
The first
thing that stood out to me from the readings when thinking how they could
benefit the media center was that wikis promoted “Collaborative annotated
bibliographies where students add summaries and critiques about course-related
readings”. Wikis can be used most effectively for group projects promoting
collaboration and student involvement and there is an accountability because
you can see the work individual students put forth. They are also very user
friendly and easy for students to learn how to navigate. I also think they are
perfect for the media center because they are ad free and come with no software
to install on computers.
After
viewing the Georgia school’s library wiki, I also realized that they can be
beneficial in reminding students of operation hours, introducing parents and
students or outsiders to the library staff, providing surveys for library
improvement, featuring different books and allowing students to browse archives.
Visiting the school wiki also showed me what an informative tool they can be.
For example they can provide students with links from research tools and file
sharing, after school events, etc. Another benefit of using wikis in the media
center is the collaboration between media specialists they promote. We can
share ideas and get tips on how to improve our media centers.
Especially
after reading the last article, Bowlan really opened my eyes to see that wikis
can also “allow students to engage the novel beyond the pages of the book”
because students can “discuss the book, share papers for peer feedback”.
How Can Wikis Be Used
Most Effectively
According
to Information Week, it’s important to “make it relevant, encourage use,
identify the leaders, change mistakes automatically, show the content provider,
state goals and respect one’s peers”. These are the best guidelines that I have
seen. I believe wikis are most effective when communicators are respecting one
another, there is accountability and ideas are being shared in non-biased ways.
Drawbacks to Using
Wikis
One of the
biggest drawbacks when using wikis is that students can delete each other’s
work, maybe not purposely but accidently.
As in the article, Seven Things
You Should Know About Wikis says, a potential to mischief exists because
anyone can modify the content with internet access. The article also points out
that an additional drawback is that structuring content can be a challenge and
wikis can create a collaborate bias because these are only perspectives of a
group.
According
to Schwartz, wikis don’t actually provide tools for project management because
it neglects organization since everyone isn’t on the same page. He also says
that wikis aren’t secure enough for sensitive information and that their
ability to export and import information from external data sources are substandard.
Strong and Weak
Points of Wikis
As I said earlier, a strong
point is that wikis are easy to use and they promote collaboration. I think it’s
important that they are democratic, accessible to all. Wikis are a great way
for students to work on projects and explore other’s opinions while defining
their own thoughts. I would say the weak points are that anyone can edit and
delete work, they can be biased or promote invalid information and perhaps
stray from the goals of the wiki. I do believe if teachers and media
specialists are monitoring the wikis, they can ensure that things don’t happen
like bad language or offensive works. I also question plagiarism since anyone
from the world can view the group’s work.
What Elements Promote
Collaboration?
Personally,
I think that one way to move wikis from passive storage cabinets to active
collaborative spaces, education wise, is to choose projects and topics students
would be very interested in. If they are assigned a boring project, they are
more out to research facts and stop at that. With fun wikis, I believe the
collaboration and opinions are endless. I also think allowing students to share
photos and videos makes the wikis more interesting and students would be more
likely to share things they would like their peers to view. So to sum up my
opinion, I think moving the wikis from passive to active is actually in the
educator’s hands because they choose how engaging the topic is.
Bibliography
Schwartz,
E. 2008. “The Advantages and
Disadvantages of Using a Wiki to Manage Your IT Projects”. Retrieved From: http://www.cio.com/article/2433907/project-management/the-advantages-and-disadvantages-of-using-a-wiki-to-manage-your-it-projects.html
2005. “Wikis: Enabling Effective Knowledge Sharing
Across the Organization. Retrieved From: http://www.informationweek.com/software/information-management/wikis-enabling-effective-knowledge-sharing-across-the-organization/d/d-id/1038866?